Register  ▪  Login  ▪  Current Issue  ▪  Contact Us  ▪  Advertise
search
Skip Navigation Links
Resources
Inspiration
Competitions
Directory
Education
DesignCasts
Print Blogs
Shop
About Us
Subscribe
Job List

 
Summary

Old magazines learn new tricks online.
 
Read the complete interviews:
 
 
 
About the Author

Emily Gordon is editor in chief of Print.

 
Related articles

 

The 2.0 of the Town

by Emily Gordon
Share/Save/Bookmark
Old magazines learn new tricks online.
 

Storied magazines The New Yorker (est. 1925) and Harper’s (1850) both launched major website redesigns this year, upping the ante among fellow classics like Scientific American (1845), The Atlantic (1857), and The Nation (1865) in the challenging game of branding such periodicals online. In this looking-glass world, how do you serve devoted print-edition readers, catch YouTubers on the fly, and appease overlords with ad revenues and subscriptions—all without losing cachet? The solution: Expert editors become web magnates, the book is broken into bits, and art and editorial must lie down together. Harpers.org puts its weighty (and free) archive front and center thanks to Paul Ford, its one-man design and programming team. Thenation.com, redesigned by Brown+Ryan in 2000, has revived readership and circulation with blogs and activist tools; Scientific American’s Webby-nominated podcasts are hits on iTunes. Everyone will be tracking The New Yorker’s evolving strategy, though, which expands the magazine experience with multimedia and will soon include searchable abstracts of the entire archive. Part of the challenge for exacting print people, as web editor Blake Eskin observes, is that “there’s a level of precision that you can’t achieve online—you can’t control kerning or line spacing, for instance,” so content and search-engine functionality are key. Winterhouse’s Jessica Helfand and William Drenttel, along with New Yorker art and edit staff, were instrumental in developing the new site’s layout (an early sketch is above), color palette (“Whoever thought that black and red could look so good?” muses Helfand), and a subtly animated Eustace Tilley butterfly. Drenttel avers: “It’s not so much revolutionary as responsible, but in a way, that’s actually harder to do.”

Read Emily Gordon’s full interviews with the Winterhouse team and the people behind the websites at Harper’s, The Nation, and Scientific American.
Reader Comments
Login to add a comment. Not a registered user? Register Now!
master class
Facebook  Flickr StumbleUpon Twitter
Share  Share this page with your friends.
Image of the Day

Image of the Day February 3, 2012 
It's Super Bowl weekend, so Ben Greenman, an Editor at the New Yorker breaks down how the football was designed. Via I Love Charts.

Most Recent Articles
Why Designers Still Can't Think
Power by Design
Gchatting with Jennifer Daniel
An Anatomy of Uncriticism
Print's February 2012 Issue
Most Popular

Carry Hope

13 designers create a custom tote bag for their favorite charity. Featuring the work of: Atelier Télescopique, Büro Destruct, Christoph Niemann, Deanne Cheuk, Ed Fella, Geoff McFetridge, Hort, James Joyce, Laurent Fetis, Rick Valicenti, Si Scott, Spin, and Sawdust. Order one today!
 
 
Check Out Past Issues

Subscribe to Print and get all 6 issues for just $40

In This Issue:
The Power Issue, in which we examine the true influence of design and the designer. On the cover: We asked Mirko Ilić to reinterpret one of the classic graphics created by Philippe Vermès during the 1968 French protests. To see the original, click here. To purchase print or digital copies of current or past issues of Print, click here.
 
 
 
 
June 2011 April 2011February 2011
Skip Navigation Links
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
Site Map
Job List
Copyright © 2012 by F+W Media.