|
|
About the Author
—
Steven Heller is the cofounder and the cochair of the MFA Designer as
Author program at the School of Visual Arts. He writes the Visuals
column for the New York Times Book Review and the Graphic Content
blog for T-Style; is editor of AIGA Voice; and is a contributor to Design Observer. He is the author, coauthor, and/or editor of more
than 120 books on design and popular culture, including the forthcoming
New Ornamental Type (Thames and Hudson). More information can be found at Heller's homepage.
See all Daily Heller posts here.
|
Right Makes Write
|
|
by Steven Heller
|
|
For anyone familiar with the marches on Washington during the Vietnam, Reagan, and Bush eras, Saturday's anti-Obama march was a parallel world. With the Democrats firmly in power, the opposition is the former silent majority, now the vocal minority. And they are employing the same demonstrative tactics the left used when it was on the outs, including strident posters.
I have been criticized for leaning left because I critique right-wing pundits and give "unequal" airtime to pro-Obama graphics. So in the spirit of fair play, I present some posters produced by the anti-Obama opposition, some of them clever, others not. The images shown here promote the Tea Party movement and are culled from The People's Cube and other sources.
For the same reason I take issue with the flagrant use of Hitler's image to vilify George W. Bush and other presidents, the transposition of Obama as a Soviet/Red (top) and the smearing of the Democratic party as Marxist (below top) shows a decided lack of imagination and historical knowledge. First, socialism as a practice (i.e. Sweden) and Soviet Communism (remember the breakup of the Soviet Union) are quite different political beasts. Representing the Obama administration with the hammer and sickle is as stupid as smearing it with a swastika. Equating the Green movement (below second from top) with fascism is, well, obtuse.
The Shepard Fairey "Change" and "Progress" posters are fair game for parody. And the poster (top) does a good job of send-up, but the message is skewed. Just as George W. Bush was not a Nazi for starting the Iraqi War, President Barack Obama is not a "commie-fascist" for advocating a government-subsidized health care plan.
That said, the graphics emanating from the Tea Parties serve the same purpose as those used at anti-war or civil rights rallies, to propagate a message, right or wrong. So, in the spirit of spirited debate, may the best posters win.
|
|
Reader Comments
|
|
It's your blog. You have a right to see things clearly and convey them to your readers. Still, I can understand why people would want to demonize Obama and analogize him to history’s despots. Mostly because they’re so scary and identifiable. Plus, they see the tremendous potential costs of healthcare. On the other side, the left thinks it has a right to counteract support for Bush's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, on which we spent an equivalent amount of money toward destruction, by demanding that their tax dollars actually serve the people who pay them. Funny that people like those at the "tea party" don't see what victims of propaganda they are. Not just these signs (they're almost comical) but by the likes of Glen Beck and Rush Limbaugh.
|
By
FinalEyes
September 15, 2009
|
|
The battle seems never-ending, doesn't it? Politics, religion, race. Will there ever be a time when people come together to try and make things better? A true, heartfelt, concerted effort to support a President who seems to expected to wave a magic wand over the huge mess that he walked into, would be surprising... and really uplifting... versus the effort put forth to smear him.
Bobbi
|
By
Bobbi
September 15, 2009
|
|
I am neither a conservative nor a liberal; both party ideologies disgust me. I am equally disgusted, however, by the inconsistent language applied to each, and by the use of this forum not to discuss potential relations between design and ideology, but to use the auspice of the former to smuggle in the latter.
While I believe that every man is a precious end-in-himself, and that no man's need is a moral or political claim on another man's mind, effort, products, life; while I think the police, military, and courts are government's only legitimate function, *I am no more "anti-Obama" than I was anti-Bush.*
I reject what both believe in, and what they stand for, i.e., their *ideas.* I reject altruism, statism and all variants of collectivism. Certain historical figures concretize, and some aesthetics symbolize, those ideologies and their consequences; to invoke them may be legitimate, depending upon the context.
I will be unsubscribing with the close of this discussion given that I already participate in many political forums which identify themselves as such.
|
By
ashleykarenroy
September 15, 2009
|
|
Interesting stuff... I find this both fascinating and terrifying as it is being used to incite irrational thinking among the electorate. As a scholar of art as propaganda, can you direct readers to research studies on howr people's emotional responses to political messages are heightened when those messages are coupled with images? I've been reading a lot about neuroscience and the research being conducted to examine how the human brain responds to word selections, phrasing and visuals, and I know some research was done years ago to show that adding visuals to words can heighten recall. But do images also serve to negatively impact rational thinking by harnessing the "reptilian brain"?
|
By
Deborah M. Budd
September 15, 2009
|
|
One cannot "incite irrational thinking." Thought is sovereign; a second-handed thinker is already irrational.
|
By
ashleykarenroy
September 15, 2009
|
|
Also found this example while seeking an iconic "workers" image from the '20s...
http://www.b12partners.net/wp/2009/08/11/reading-around-on-august-10th-through-august-11th/
|
By
Deborah M. Budd
September 15, 2009
|
|
One of my favorite books on the subject of propaganda and media manipulation is Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World Revisited." Here is a website that reproduces the majority of contents:
http://www.huxley.net/bnw-revisited/index.html
Regarding Ms. Roy's "auspices of the former tot smuggle the latter:" I accept your criticism, but would argue that design and politics have been wed for a long time, and my job is to address design in all its manifestations. How ideologies are communicated using design manners and techniques are within the purview. Smuggling is not my intent (even if you think it is the outcome). This is a design forum that does not ignore the world(s) in which design functions. If you review past posts you'll find politics is but one function.
|
By
Steven Heller
September 15, 2009
|
|
|
|
Featured Event: Live DesignCast
 Presented by: Jeff Fisher
When: February 18, 2010
Learn how to use Facebook,
Twitter and blogging to grow
your business, build networks,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Image of the Day
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Popular
|
|
|
|
|
|