There’s a lot of filth in the world of arts, letters and education. Particularly in the 1950s, even before the current president made it OK to be smutty, immoral, suggestive and lustful. Booklets issued by decency groups did their best to contain the content, and one of the graphic design methods was abstract illustration.
They weren’t Jackson Pollack or Willem De Kooning or Franz Klein, but the abstract form was ambiguous enough to keep the depictions from being too salacious yet cautionary at the same time. Here are a couple of choice examples.
The experts who write for PRINT magazine cover the why of design—why the world of design looks the way it does, how it has evolved, and why the way it looks matters. Subscribe to PRINT today, and get in on the conversation of what the brightest minds in the field are talking about right now—essential insight that every designer should know to get ahead.
Treat yourself and your team to a year of PRINT for $40—which includes the massive Regional Design Awards issue ($30 on newsstands).