You Can’t Judge a Jack Kirby Book By its Cover

Jack Kirby characters

The Art of Jack Kirby, by Ray Wyman, (The Blue Rose Press, 1992). The cover is signed “Kirby/Eastman” but there’s little evidence of Kirby. Kevin Eastman is the co-creator of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and also wrote the foreword.

Jack Kirby is widely recognized as one of the most important comic creators of the 20th century. Co-creator of Captain America, the Fantastic Four, the Hulk, the X-Men, and creator of Darkseid, The Demon, OMAC and myriad others, he still can’t get no respect.

Early in 1992 my phone rang. At the time I was an art director at a book publisher in Manhattan, and it was a sometime before I learned the art of being taken to lunch. On the other end was a book agent. “Do you want to go to lunch?” “No thanks,” I replied. “Then I guess you don’t want to meet Jack Kirby?” Less then an hour later I walked into the lobby of the hotel where the Kirbys were staying. I was the first to arrive, and walked over and introduced myself to Jack and Roz. The raison d’être for the meeting was that Jack and Ray Wyman were shopping around The Art of Jack Kirby.  I will save the details of that meeting for another time, but suffice it to say Jack regaled me with war stories over lunch, and I met one of the greatest influences on my early life. Unfortunately I could not convince my publisher how important I believed the book to be. Sadly, almost exactly two years later I learned Jack had passed.

A short time afterward I took a trip with my family to San Francisco and we visited the Cartoon Art Museum there. Truth be told, I only had a cursory interest in comics at that time. Although a friend tried to keep me abreast of current “good” comics (Dark Knight Returns and Watchmen), my interest had waned after Kirby left DC in the mid 1970s and I had lost track of him and the comic book industry in general. Much to my surprise The Art of Jack Kirby sat on a shelf for sale. But something was wrong. The cover didn’t look like Kirby, and although it was signed “Jack Kirby / Kevin Eastman” I could discern very little Kirby at all. In a decision I’ve regretted every since I passed up the chance to buy a copy based on the cover, and have yet to find an affordable copy.

Cut to present day and it was with great expectations to see that a university press would be publishing Charles Hatfield’s Hand of Fire: The Comics Art of Jack Kirby. Hatfield, after all, is a college professor of English at California State University, Northridge and the author of Alternative Comics: An Emerging Literature, as well as many articles over the years for The Jack Kirby Collector. However, when I finally saw the cover I had that same sinking feeling I had years earlier: “That doesn’t look like Kirby.” Sure enough, as Hatfield explained on his blog: “Re: the cover, I love Geoff Grogan’s image, and I’m proud to have it! I commissioned it. The Press and I discussed many options for the cover. There were legal constraints, of course. The decision to go with a new, original illustration rather than a photo of Kirby was my call. I’m digging the results!

Kirby, hand of fire

Hand of Fire: The Comics Art of Jack Kirby by Charles Hatfield (University Press of Mississippi, 2011), illustration by Geoff Grogan.

As I designer I know there were infinite possibilities, regardless of the rights issue, beyond a choice of a photo or Kirby art. With all due respect to Geoff Grogan I am hard pressed to understand why someone would opt for an imitation of the artist the book is about. Can you imagine a book on Matisse, Picasso or Pollock, or pretty much any “fine” artist with faux art on the cover? For me it represents that a serious take on comic artists and Kirby in particular still has a long way to go.

Published almost simultaneously this year was Lee and Kirby: The Wonder Years, an oversized trade paperback edition of The Jack Kirby Collector, written by the late Mark Alexander, with a cover (and interior) designed by publisher John Morrow. Unfortunately, once again, for a book about Lee and Kirby’s Fantastic Four years, Kirby is nowhere to be seen on the cover.

Wonder years

Lee & Kirby: The Wonder Years by Mark Alexander, (TwoMorrows Publishing, 2011) design by John Morrow.

Actually both these tomes represent a long standing tradition of packaging books about and containing art by Kirby with someone else’s art on the covers. Kirby drew hundreds or more covers in his lifetime, yet apparently isn’t qualified to grace his own books.

An early example of this is the Silver Surfer Novel, published by Marvel/Fireside Books in 1978. Hailed as the first new (and final) collaboration in many years between Stan Lee and Jack Kirby, “All New…The Ultimate Cosmic Experience!” Lee and Kirby shared equal billing on the cover over a painting by Earl Norem.  Perhaps the conventional wisdom was that “painted covers look like paperback covers,” yet when Marvel signed a deal with Lancer books in the mid 1960s to reprint their comics for the first time in mass-market paperback format, it was recycled (and pastiched) Kirby art that they utilized.

Silver surfer novel

The Silver Surfer by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby (Fireside/Marvel 1978), cover painting by Earl Norem. In contrast to the Lancer paperback from 1966, which featured Kirby art.

Lancer paperback

Marvel continued this practice going forward. The cover of Fantastic Four Number One, November 1961 is one Kirby’s most iconic covers. For Marvel’s Fantastic Four Omnibus Volume One (2005), which contains only Kirby’s art within, they featured an Alex Ross painting based on the cover, although they did issue a variant cover as well one with Kirby’s original cover. Covering the same material with Kirby’s name once again featured prominently, the Fantastic Four Masterworks Volumes One through Six, issued in 2009 displayed covers by Dean White. For the Fantastic Four Omnibus Volume Two they issued an alternate with a painting by Mexican artist Ladronn.  The Hulk Omnibus and Masterworks volumes sport competing “interpretations” by Ross and White, respectively. The Avengers Masterworks Volumes One and Two again featured cover art by White while prominently flaunting the Kirby moniker; likewise Captain America Masterworks, The Avengers Omnibus, and Thor Omnibus series. According to Marvel, Thor contains: “The painstakingly restored classic tales that gave birth to the greatest saga of myth and adventure to ever grace the comic book page!” Similarly, despite touting Kirby, the Tales From Asgard Omnibus selling copy boasts “ Read these stories as never before with all-new, modern coloring and six extraordinary interlocking covers by current THOR artist Olivier Coipel.” For the record Marvel, unlike DC and many other publishers in these days of high res. scans, has continued the practice of hiring artists to trace and recolor the original pages, so one can make the argument that you aren’t getting Kirby art in the interiors as well.

Dueling Fantastic Four Number Ones: Kirby’s original...

... Alex Ross ...

... and Dean White reinventions. The White covers are signed Kirby/White although the art is only based on Kirby’s.

In 2008 Abrams published the Eisner Award winning Kirby: King of Comics by Kirby biographer and former assistant Mark Evanier. While not his long awaited biography, this coffee table book featured beautifully reproduced artwork plus a succinct biography. The cover, by designer Paul Sahre, solved the rights issue, as well as which Kirby art does one display from what comic book company, by creating a dynamic wrap around collage featuring tightly cropped images of various elements and characters: a gray Hulk, a hint of Captain America’s shield, a rocket ship, etc. Unfortunately Sahre left mid-project due to creative differences, so the interior does not display the same level of creativity he was able to put on view earlier with Maximum Fantastic Four, with its inventive folded poster cover and panel-by-panel enlargements, a tribute to FF #1, ironically published by Marvel in 2005. The Abrams cover was a toned down version of Sahre’s original design and oddly, they chose to devote a gatefold to an Alex Ross “interpretation” of a Kirby splash, quite a bit of real estate to give away for a work of art not by the subject at hand.

Paul Sahre’s original Kirby: King of Comics cover (Abrams, 2008). The published version removed Sahre’s wrap around white lettering.

Likewise three versions of The Incredible Hulk by the same trio of artists

The Incredible Hulk, art by Alex Ross

The Incredible Hulk, art by Dean White

Kirby's iconic world eating godlike Galactus reinterpreted by Ladronn andWhite.

Sahre’s inventive poster cover for Maximum Fantastic Four (Marvel, 2005) that folds out to reveal Kirby art for the cover of Fantastic Four number one.

One can only hope that when Evanier finally gets around to publishing his biographic opus on Kirby that the cover will feature art by the subject, or a design that pays tribute without resorting to simulation or trying blatantly to appeal to a contemporary audience. Sometimes imitation is not the highest form of flattery.

Steven Brower is a graphic designer, writer and educator and the former Creative Director/ Art Director of Print.  He is the author/designer of books on Louis Armstrong, Mort Meskin, Woody Guthrie and the history of mass-market paperbacks. He is Director of the “Get Your Masters with the Masters” low residency MFA program for educators and working professionals at Marywood University in Scranton, PA.


More Design Resources:


15 thoughts on “You Can’t Judge a Jack Kirby Book By its Cover

  1. Pingback: Free Comic Book Day

  2. Pingback: The Advertising Power of Comic Book Artists — Imprint-The Online Community for Graphic Designers

  3. David Greybeard

    I think you’re a bit off base because you haven’t considered the mind of the comic book collector. For example, the magificent Alex Ross ALTERNATIVE covers offer a wonderful homage to Kirby while giving Marvel fans something new. Face it, we hard core Marvel collectors have seen the same Kirby art for over 40 years; there’s nothing NEW coming from Kirby! So, to have another artist pay homge to Kirby will get attention a volume otherwise might not have.
    You’ve also neglected to mention the most important Kirby books. The books that actually reprint his body of work! At Marvel, the main Marvel Masterworks series of hardcover books. EVERY volume containing Kirby, indeed has a Kirby cover! Dozens of books (a hundred?) reprinting everything of Kirby, ALL with Kirby Covers. You also neglected to mention, the wonderful books DC has printed containing all the reprints of the Kirby comics, OMAC, Demon, the Fourth World series, etc. ALL with terrific Kirby covers! Then there’s every issue of the Jack Kirby Collecter and the collected volumes of the magazine.
    Your whole premise falls apart if you actually look at all the Kirby books out there.

  4. Patrick Lemaire

    Actually, Dean White’s paintings over Kirby pencils are Kirby art. Pretending the art is only Dean White’s (as you do in the top illustrattion) is dishonest. If your notion of Kirby art is that it has to be pure Kirby then the so-called original comic book covers which weren’t inked and colored by Kirby don’t qualify either. Inkers traced or modified Kirby’s pencils. Colorists added color without input by Kirby. How is that different from an artist painting over Kirby?

  5. Isaiah Sheppard

    Thanks for this post. I can’t help but feel that the post-1970’s marketers were either trying to “refresh” the covers for a new generation that didn’t grow up seeing Jack’s work and/or legal issues with Jack’s estate. I don’t have a problem with Two Morrows Publishing cover, as they publish the Jack Kirby Collection series (disclosure: I have a number of those issues).
    I have less issues with these covers than I do for the recent adult animation series that rendered art in the style of Mr. Kirby.

  6. Mark Badger

    While I don’t like the cover of Hand of Fire very much for all of the above reasons, it actually works because the book is a very good critical study of Jack’s work. Hand of Fire has a richness to it that gets at some of the depths involved in what makes Jack a great artist. If your actually into Kirby and not just a graphic designer it’s a very worthwhile read.

  7. Charles Hatfield

    Given the title of your article, “You Can’t Judge a Jack Kirby Book By its Cover,” I’m nonplussed to note that that is precisely what you have done with Hand of Fire:
    For me it represents that a serious take on comic artists and Kirby in particular still has a long way to go.
    The seriousness of my book’s content will, I hope, speak for itself.

  8. Josue Menjivar

    Excellent article. I’ve had this gripe for years. I thought Kirby was a natural graphic designer. His covers were well thought out and yet everytime I would see a Kirby collection, the designers thought otherwise. I agree with you in hoping the Evanier figures out how to make that great Kirby biography using Kirby art.
    Thank you.

  9. Ben Towle

    It always strikes me as odd when I see this happen. Three other relatively recent instances of this I can think of are the Nancy and Marvin Monster collections, which have covers by the books’ desiger, Seth–and also the TCJ collection of Harvey Kurtzman material that has a Jack Davis cover.

  10. Henry R. Kujawa

    Yes, some of these covers for “books about Jack Kirby” are a disgrace. They inspire one to ask, not “What were they thinking?”, but What the F*** were they thinking?”
    On the other hand, I rather like the Dean White paintings. Unlike “overdone color” which obliterates the linework (see many “ESSENTIAL” books), or some of those other paintings, at least White manages to capture the design and excitement of the original art, and has done it with Kirby, Ditko, and perhaps others. (I understand he’d stopped; too bad.)
    Kirby not being considered good enough to design his own covers began as far back as 1970, when Stan Lee got the hair-brained idea to have Marie Severin either draw covers or design cover sketches for the entire line, to give Marvel a more “uniform” look. In the early 60’s, that “uniform” look WAS Kirby covers. Just think how utterly absurd it is to have Marie Severin doing covers or cover designs for Kirby, or Colan, or others. I’d rather she been drawing a series herself. Her SUB-MARINER was one of the few versions that managed to capture somethign special about Bill Everett’s creation. (Everett, of course, was not allowed to write or draw his own character until a year before he passed away, by which time, Roy Thomas & Gerry Coinway had MURDERED the book, and someone must have figured, “At this point, what can it hurt?”).

  11. patrick ford

    As you mention you would never see an art book on Rembrandt with artwork by another artist on the cover. The Hand of Fire cover reminds me of someone doing a comically exaggerated nasal imitation of Bob Dylan’s singing.