Register  ▪  Login  ▪  Current Issue  ▪  Contact Us  ▪  Advertise
search
Skip Navigation Links
Resources
Inspiration
Competitions
Directory
Education
DesignCasts
Print Blogs
Shop
About Us
Subscribe
Job List
Modern Typography in Britain
 
Typography Papers 8
Modern Typography in Britain: Graphic Design, Politics, and Society, edited by Paul Stiff with contributions from Matthew Eve, Robin Fior, Stuart Hall, Sally Jeffery, Robin Kinross, David Lambert, and Petra Cerne Oven
London: Hyphen Press, 2009
All images courtesy of Hyphen Press
 
About the Author

Paul Shaw is a Print contributing editor. He teaches the history of graphic design and the history of type at the School of Visual Arts. His most recent book is Helvetica and the New York City Subway System: The True (Maybe) Story.
 
About Remaindered

Remaindered is intended to be an outlet to call attention to books and journals that are worthy of note, yet have not been reviewed in Print and that have gone overlooked by the blogosphere. It will eventually be one of several rotating columns Paul Shaw will write exclusively for printmag.com.

Remaindered: Typography Papers 8

by Paul Shaw
Share/Save/Bookmark
Typography Papers, edited, designed and “prepared for press” by the Department of Typography & Graphic Communication at the University of Reading in England, has always been a somewhat misnamed journal, considering that it has rarely stuck to the subject of typography. The eighth and most recent issue, entitled Modern Typography in Britain, is a collection of essays devoted wholly to graphic design in postwar Britain, an unexplored corner of graphic design history. As such, it provides an alternative to the spate of competing mega-narratives by Stephen Eskilson, Roxane Jubert, and the duo of Johanna Drucker and Emily McVarish.

 
This is especially true of Paul Stiff's opening essay, “Austerity, Optimism: Modern Typography in Britain after the War,” which provides an overview for the ten others that follow. Stiff stresses the political and social context in which typography—commonly called “design for printing”—operated between 1945 and 1954. During that eight-year span, design played a crucial role in the effort to reconstruct Britain in the aftermath of World War II, as the country grappled with rationing and the formation of a modern welfare state. It was also the moment when the modernization of design (at least in England) began with the emergence of the “small-business model of graphic design practice” that served as an alternative to the studio full of artists.

 
The names and institutions that appear in the remaining ten essays that comprise Modern Typography in Britain are largely unfamiliar to audiences outside (and maybe even inside) modern-day England. Picture Post, for example, was a British counterpart to Life magazine that, during its heyday from 1938 to 1945, presented anti-fascist content in a modernist layout. It was heavily influenced by its first editor Stefan Lorant, a Jewish refugee from Nazi-occupied Hungary. Adprint, Rathbone Books and Aldus Books—all founded by the Austrian Wolfgang Foges—were publishers that focused on illustrated popular educational books.

 
Desmond Jeffery, another subject, was a jobbing letterpress printer who was inspired by H.N. Werkman, Max Bill, Karl Gerstner, and Josef Müller-Brockmann. He learned typography from Anthony Froshaug and often set type (usually Futura or Standard, never Helvetica) for other designers, but he never considered himself a designer. Politics was an integral part of his life and work, just as it was for Ken Garland and Ian McLaren, all of whom were active in the Committee for Nuclear Disarmament (CND). Other essays focus on Marie Neurath and Isotype and Ernest Hoch. Several themes emerge in these essays, such as the impact of Central European emigrés on British design, the leftist leanings of modernist design, and the close-knit nature of the design world with its interlocking friendships.

 
Modern Typography in Britain does not tell the whole story of British graphic design after World War II—its subject matter reflects the leftist leanings of its contributors—but it tells a story that is worth hearing, a story that focuses more on politics and design’s role in society than on aesthetics. This is history rather than eye candy.
Reader Comments
Login to add a comment. Not a registered user? Register Now!
master class
Facebook  Flickr StumbleUpon Twitter
Share  Share this page with your friends.
Image of the Day

Image of the Day February 8, 2012 
Gig poster for Thurston Moore at Maxwell's, Hoboken. Design by Morning Breath.

Most Recent Articles
Why Designers Still Can't Think
Power by Design
Gchatting with Jennifer Daniel
An Anatomy of Uncriticism
Print's February 2012 Issue
Most Popular

Carry Hope

13 designers create a custom tote bag for their favorite charity. Featuring the work of: Atelier Télescopique, Büro Destruct, Christoph Niemann, Deanne Cheuk, Ed Fella, Geoff McFetridge, Hort, James Joyce, Laurent Fetis, Rick Valicenti, Si Scott, Spin, and Sawdust. Order one today!
 
 
Check Out Past Issues

Subscribe to Print and get all 6 issues for just $40

In This Issue:
The Power Issue, in which we examine the true influence of design and the designer. On the cover: We asked Mirko Ilić to reinterpret one of the classic graphics created by Philippe Vermès during the 1968 French protests. To see the original, click here. To purchase print or digital copies of current or past issues of Print, click here.
 
 
 
 
June 2011 April 2011February 2011
Skip Navigation Links
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
Site Map
Job List
Copyright © 2012 by F+W Media.