Lest I Forget Tibor

Posted inThe Daily Heller
Thumbnail for Lest I Forget Tibor

There is no anniversary, no special event. Just from time to time, I think of Tibor Kalman. With the sad passing of Steve Jobs, I thought about Tibor because he too, was stricken by cancer too early in his life. So, lest I and you forget, I have compiled two artifacts. The visuals are the invitation from his posthumous exhibition, “Tiborocity,” realized by Maira Kalman, originally installed in 2000 at The New Museum in New York, and ultimately traveled around the world. I wrote this article in 2001.

Tibor Kalman: Provocateur

In the mid-1980s two names changed graphic design: Mac and Tibor. The former needs no introduction. Nor, with various books and articles by and about him, does the latter. Tibor Kalman, who died on May 2, 1999 after a courageously long battle with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, was one of the few graphic designers whose accomplishments were legend within the field and widely known outside as well. Tibor may not be as influential on the daily practice of graphic design as Mac, but his sway over how designers think, indeed how they define their roles in culture and society, is indisputable. For a decade he was the design profession’s moral compass and its most fervent provocateur.

I first saw Tibor in 1986 [I believe] when, as master of ceremonies of the annual AIGA/New York “Fresh Dialogues” evening, he transformed the navel-gazing event into a cultural circus. He assembled a cast of a dozen relative unknowns and a few prematurely forgotten to enlighten and entertain. Each gave five minute offerings about the overall visual culture, rather than show their own design. Although at times it resembled an elementary school show-and-tell, the majority of talks were unique insights into ignored issues of environmental waste, the virtues of unsophisticated design, and the divisions between modernism and postmodernism. Some were funny, others serious — together they were truly fresh dialogues.

Tibor was a tough ringmaster. If any individual talk went thirty-seconds beyond its allotted time (or if he felt that it was unbearably dull) the amplified sound of hungry barking dogs pierced the presenter’s soliloquy, signaling the end of his or her segment. In addition, Tibor introduced quirky short films, an unexpected pizza delivery (by a surprised delivery boy), and souvenir hand-outs designed by a job printer and reproduced at QuickCopy that showed design at its most rudimentary, yet communicative. As a new twist on the old ventriloquist’s dummy, Tibor’s on-stage straight-man was a Mac Classic with a happy face that quipped at programmed intervals. This was the first of many public salvos against the status-quo, but more important it was vintage Tibor.

Not since the height of American Modernism during the late 1940s and 1950s had one designer prodded other designers to take responsibility for their work as designer-citizens. With a keen instinct for public relations, a penchant for Barnum-like antics, and a radical consciousness from his days as an SDS organizer, by the late 1980s Tibor became known as (or maybe he even dubbed himself) the “Bad Boy” of graphic design.

When the clothing company Esprit, which had prided itself as socially liberal and environmentally friendly, was awarded the 1986 AIGA Corporate Leadership Award, an irate Tibor anonymously distributed leaflets during the awards ceremony at the AIGA National Conference in San Francisco protesting the company’s exploitation of Asian laborers. Tibor believed that award-winning design involved the entire corprorate ethic and argued that “many bad company’s have great design.” Two years later, as co-chair with Milton Glaser of the AIGA Conference, “Dangerous Ideas,” in San Antonio, he admonished designers to question the effects of their work on the environment and refuse to accept any client’s product at face value. As an object lesson and act of hubris, he challenged designer Joe Duffy to an impromptu debate about a full page advertisement that he and his then partner, British corporate designer Michael Peters, had placed in the Wall Street Journal promoting their services to Fortune 500 corporations. While most designers admired this promotional effort, Tibor insisted that the ad had “sold-out” to corporate capitalism and insured mediocrity. This outburst was the first, but not the last, where Tibor criticized another designer in public for perceived misdeeds. By the early 1990s, Tibor also had written (or collaborated with others in writing) numerous finger-wagging manifestos that exposed the pitfalls of what he sarcastically called “professional” design.

Tibor saw himself as a social activist for whom graphic design was a means to achieve two ends. First, good design, which he defined as “unexpected and untried,” added more interest, and was thus a benefit to everyday life. Second, since graphic design is mass communication, it should be used to appeal to public awareness on a variety of social issues. His own design firm, M&Co, which started selling conventional “design by the pound” to banks and department stores, was transformed in the mid-1980s into a soap box for his social mission.

He urged clients, like Restaurant Florent, to use the advertising that M&Co had created for them to promote political or social messages. He devoted M&Co’s seasonal self-promotional gifts to advocate support for homelessness. Rather than send the usual offerings, one Christmas he mailed out over 300 small cardboard boxes filled with the typical contents of a homeless shelter’s barely nutritional meal (a sandwich, cracker, candy bar, etc.) and offered to match any contributions that the recipients made to a homelessness agency. The following year he sent a book peppered with facts about poverty along with twenty dollars and a stamped envelope addressed to a another charity.

Tibor was criticized for using homelessness as a public relations ploy to garner attention for M&Co. And indeed he was a master at piquing public interest in just this way. But he was also ingenuous. Perhaps the impulse came from his childhood, when as a seven year old Hungarian immigrant fleeing the Communists he and his family were displaced — virtually homeless — in a new land. Although he became more American than most natives, he never forgot the time when he was an alien.

Although he savored the nuances of type, and had a fetish for vernacular design — the untutored or quotidian signs, marquees, billboards, and packages that comprise mass culture — he understood that connoisseurship meant nothing unless the deeds it engendered supported a message that led to action. Even most stylistic work must be viewed in the context of Tibor’s persistence. Everything had to have meaning and resonance. A brochure for a real estate developer, like Red Square, an apartment building on the [now gentrified] Lower East Side of Manhattan, had to be couched in how it would benefit the surrounding low-income community. One message was never enough. When Tibor sold a “design” to a client, he did not hype a particular typeface or color, but rather how the end result would simultaneously advance both client and culture.

Tibor did not, however, rebel against being a professional — M&Co. was in business to be a successful business and he enjoyed the financial rewards. Nonetheless, he challenged the conventions of success. “Everyone can hire a good photographer, choose a tasteful typeface and produce a perfect mechanical,” Tibor once railed. “So What? That means ninety-five percent of the work exists on the same professional level, which for me is the same as being mediocre.” Hence Tibor ardently avoided any solution, or any client, that would perpetuate this bete noir. About clients Tibor said: “We’re
not here to give them what’s safe and expedient. We’re not here to help eradicate everything of visual interest from the face of the earth. We’re here to make them think about design that’s dangerous and unpredictable. We’re here to inject art into commerce.”

With little patience for mundane and insipid thinking whether it came from clients, other designers, or M&Co, Tibor was intolerant of mindless consistency and was not reluctant to make people mad — including associates, friends, and allies. For example, in a speech before the 19?? Modernism and Eclecticism design history symposium, he accused two friends, Charles Spencer Anderson and Paula Scher, who revived historical styles at that time, of being grave-robbers who abrogated their responsibility as creators. Curiously, M&Co had developed a house style of its own based on vernacularism, the so-called “undesign” that Tibor celebrated for its unfettered expression, which also fed into the post-modern penchant for referencing the past. While Tibor’s ire sometimes seemed inconsistent with his own practice he rationalized M&Co’s use of vernacular as a symbol of protest — a means of undermining the cold conformity of the International corporate style.

M&Co left scores of design artifacts behind, but Tibor will be remembered more by his critiques on the nature of consumption and production than by his formal studio achievements, which were contributed to by many talented design associates. Despite numerous entries in design annuals, and the catalog of objects in his own book Tibor Kalman: Perverse Optimist, the guts of Tibor’s accomplishment was enlarging the parameters of design from service to cultural force. And this was no more apparent than in his later work. For when Tibor realized that stylish record albums, witty advertisements, and humorous watches and clocks had a limited cultural value, he turned to editing.

First, he signed on as creative director of the magazines Art Forum and Interview. But he merely guided the look not the content of these media. In fact, without total control he was frustrated by his inability to experiment with a new pictorial narrative theory that he was developing. As a teenager he was an avid Life magazine reader, and believed that in the age of electronic media, photojournalism was still a more effective way to convey significant stories. While editing pictures for the photographer Olivieri Toscani, who had created the pictorial advertising identity for Benetton, the Italian clothing manufacturer, Tibor helped produce a series of controversial advertisements focusing on AIDS, racism, refugees, violence, and warfare which carried the Benetton logo but eschewed the fashions it sold. For him this was sublimely subversive.

Product-less commercial advertisements were not altogether new. In the 1980s Kenneth Cole and Ben and Jerry’s Ice Cream companies devoted advertising and packaging space to promote social and environmental causes. But in the 1990s Benetton went a step further with what began as “The United Colors of Benetton,” a product-based series of multicultural kids promoting ethnic and racial harmony, that evolved into caption-less double truck journalistic photographs. Ultimately the ads begot Benetton’s own magazine, Colors, for which Tibor became editor-in-chief and where he continued to reject fashion magazine clichés in favor of socio-political issues. Colors quickly became the primary outlet for Tibor’s most progressive ideas. And a year after launching the magazine, he closed M&Co’s doors and moved to Rome.

Colors was “The first magazine for the global village,” Tibor announced, “aimed at an audience of flexible minds, young people between fourteen and twenty, or curious people of any age.” It was also the outlet for Tibor’s political activism. In his proudest issue devoted to racism a feature titled “How To Change Your Race,” examined cosmetic means of altering hair, lips, noses, eyes, and, of course, skin color to achieve some kind of platonic ideal. Another feature in the same issue, “What If…” was a collection of full-page manipulated photographs showing famous people racially transformed: Queen Elizabeth and Arnold Schwarzenegger as black; Pope John Paul II as Asian; Spike Lee as white; and Michael Jackson was further given a Nordic cast. “Race is not the real issue here,” Kalman noted. “Power and sex are the dominant forces in the world.”

Through its vivid coverage of such themes as deadly weapons, street violence, and hate groups, Colors was a vivid contrast to Benetton’s fashion products. Even the way it was printed, on pulp paper, which soaked up ink and muted the color reproductions, went counter to the brightly lighted Benetton shops with happy clothes in vibrant colors. Yet Colors served to “contextualize,” as Tibor defined it, Toscani’s advertising imagery. Indeed the basis for criticism leveled at Benetton’s advertising campaign had been the absence of context. Without a caption or explanatory text the images appeared gratuitous — shocking yes, but uninformative. The campaign signaled that Benetton had some kind of a social conscience, but the ads themselves failed to explain what it was. With Colors the advertisements appear as teasers for a magazine that critically addressed war and peace, love and hate, power and sex.

Cancer forced Tibor to return to New York in 1997 where, despite grueling chemo and radiation therapy, he re-established M&Co with a mission to take a pro-active approach to design and art direction. Foreseeing his last chance to do meaningful work, Tibor accepted only projects that would have lasting impact. He began writing OpArt critiques for the OpEd Page of The New York Times, attacking smoking and noise pollution, among other issues. He designed an outdoor installation of photographs of real people quoting their relationships to Times Square, which hung on the scaffold around the Conde Nast tower in Times Square. He taught a weekly class in pictorial narrative in the MFA/Design program at the School of Visual Arts until a week before he died. And he continued to contribute articles on popular and vernacular culture to various magazines. As his last testament he designed “Tiborocity,” an retrospective exhibition at SFMoMA, constructed as thematic “neighborhoods” which integrated Tibor’s work with his graphic influences from the Sixties and Seventies.

Two names changed design in the eighties and nineties: Mac and Tibor. One changed the way we work, the other the way we think. The former is our tool, the latter was our conscience.

(See yesterday’s Nightly Daily Heller for what’s NeXT for Paul Rand and Steve Jobs.)

Tibor Kalman
Tibor Kalman

Resources Recommended by Imprint

  1. Get Inspired: Color Inspirations

  2. Creative Workshop, filled with 80 Brainstorming Challenges

  3. Get an inside look at logo design from Chermayeff & Geismar

  4. Join Imprint‘s contributor, Fahrenheit 212 for Keep It Simple Stupid: The Art of Designing Ideas

  5. Design TV: Improve your design skills with help from experts in the design industry.